Book
collections on CD and DVD. A library for the price of a book.
Limited time offer: 2 for the price of 1
Add Richard Dawkins to this short list. His latest book is a collection of essays, introductions, reviews, and eulogies collected over the last decade.
A Devil's Chaplain is organized in seven sections, but almost
all of its essays are informed by the encyclopedia knowledge of evolution
and the particularized point of view that Dawkins has developed.
Dawkins is a militant atheist who takes on the creationists in a few of
these pieces. His most chilling anecdote involves creationist television
producers who misrepresented their intentions and inveigled Dawkins to
participate in a taped interview. Only when Dawkins sees the finished
product does he realize that his answers have been taken out of context
and arrayed behind misleading questions, so he seems to advocate portions
of their propagandistic agenda. Duplicity aside, Dawkins also challenges
the very notions on which religions are founded, fairly but firmly.
He carefully distinguishes knowledge derived from the scientific method
from knowledge derived from revelation or other non-testable sources.
He saves his greatest scorn for the three monotheistic faiths that sprang
from
the Middle
East, especially in an essay he writes after the 9/11 attacks.
Dawkins and Stephen Jay Gould were the two most prominent neo-Darwinians, but they had substantial scientific and interpretational differences which they debated civilly in print before Gould died. They shared an abiding respect for each other and a mutual recognition that they were two of the greatest scientific stylists of the day. In a couple of reviews and a memoir written upon the occasion of Gould's death, Dawkins demonstrates how disputes should be handled within the world of science. He does not hesitate to explain how and why he thinks Gould is wrong, but he also asserts that evolutionary studies are the better for Gould having joined the debate.
Dawkins was one of the first to develop the idea of the meme, "a self-replicating element of culture passed on by imitation." While some memes, like religions, are viruses of the mind in Dawkins's view, others are less pernicious, and all are useful ways of mapping the new phenomenon that humans brought to the evolutionary process, the notion of cultural change. Dawkins summarizes the growing complexities of memetic scholarship that have occurred since he first introduced the concept in the 1970s.
Whatever his topic, Dawkins writes with a lively erudite style that
rewards the attentive reader. Commenting on the mumbo-jumbo of post-modern
deconstructionism, he adduces the Dawkins Law of Conservation of Difficulty,
which states that "obscurantism in an academic subject expands to fill
the vacuum of its intrinsic simplicity." Dawkins distinguishes his
science from his politics in another passage condemning Social Darwinism:
"There is no inconsistency in favouring Darwinism as an academic scientist
while opposing it as a human being; any more than there is inconsistency
in explaining cancer as an academic doctor while fighting it as a practising
one." He forever remains a champion of true science, and explains
why as clearly as anyone: "Science boosts its claim to truth by its spectacular
ability to
make matter and energy jump through hoops on command, and to predict
what will happen and when." Would that the religionists could state
their aims and base assumptions with comparable common sense and clarity.
Dialogue on favorite books with Deane Rink before and during his latest trek to Antarctica, with a note from Bill Ransom and a digression about Frank Herbert (a.k.a Bookbabble 101) -- a very long and rapidly growing document:
Book reviews by Richard SeltzerThis site is published by B&R Samizdat Express, 33 Gould St., West Roxbury, MA 02132. 617-469-2269 seltzer@samizdat.com
Book
collections on CD and DVD. A library for the price of a book.
Limited time
offer: 2 for the price of 1
Return to B&R Samizdat Express
| Internet Business Showcase: | ||
|
|
|