BUSINESS ON THE WORLD WIDE WEB:

where "word of keystroke" begins

November 14, 2002 -- PR in tough times


Transcript of the live chat session that took place Thursday, November 14, 2002. These sessions are normally scheduled for 12 noon-1 PM US Eastern Time (Standard Time = GMT -5, Daylight Savings Time = GMT -4) on Thursdays.

To connect to the chat room, go to www.samizdat.com/chat-intro.html

Since the chat itself happens at a rapid pace, it's often difficult to note interesting facts and URLs as they appear live. Here's a place to take a more leisurely look. I've rearranged some of the pieces to try to capture the various threads of discussion (which sometimes get lost in the rush of live chat).

Please send email with your follow-on questions and comments, and suggestions for topics we should focus on in future sessions. So long as the volume of email responses is manageable, I'll post the most pertinent ones here for all to see.

These sessions are hosted by Richard Seltzer. If you would like to receive email reminders of our chat sessions, simply send a blank email message to businessonthewebchats-subscribe@yahoogroups.com or go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/businessonthewebchats and sign up there.

This is one of the longest-running chat programs on the Web. (Please let us know if you know of ones that are older.) We've been doing this since June 1996.

For transcripts of previous sessions and a list of future topics, www.samizdat.com/chat.html.

For an article on how to make "business chat" work (based on this experience), www.samizdat.com/events.html.

For articles on topics related to this one, check our newsletter, Internet-on-a-Disk www.samizdat.com/ioad.html


Threads (reconstructed afterwards)


Participants


Introductions

11:04 - Richard Seltzer
     We'll be starting in about 50 minutes at noon Eastern Time. As you connect, please introduce yourself and let us now
     your interests. We should be joined soon by Ethel Kaiden and John Commando, who are going to talk about PR in
     down times.

 11:58 - Ethel Kaiden
     Ethel is on line. Hello Richard, hello John

 11:59 - Richard Seltzer
     Welcome, Ethel. It's time to get started. Please introduce yourself, and let us know something about your experience in
     PR, both on and off the Internet.

 12:02 - Ethel Kaiden
     Hi Folks, I am Ethel Kaiden. I have over 20 years of Public Relations experience at major companies, small start-up dot-coms and agencies. I specialize in industry marketing and the Internet.

 12:50 - Richard Seltzer     (Re: 12:48 - Ethel Kaiden 'John and I can be reached at JohnC@needhamgroup.com or EthelK@needham...')
      Plug -- I worked with Ethel at Digital, back in the days of the Internet Business Group, when she helped put not just
      Digital, but the Internet on the PR map (remember when few people knew that the Internet could be used effectively
      for business?) She knows her stuff...

 12:52 - Ethel Kaiden
     THANKS Richard -- I remember the first or second Internet World when we came up with the slogan that one day your
     internet address would be as important as your phone number -- everyone laughed at us!

 12:52 - Richard Seltzer     (Re: 12:52 - Ethel Kaiden 'THANKS Richard _ I remember the first or second Internet...')
     I remember the folks from fledgling Netscape coming by and begging Digital to invest...

 12:02 - Richard Seltzer
     Ethel -- when you say that you specialize in industry marketing and the Internet, do you mean the Internet as a
     marketplace or the Internet as a means of communication, a way of delivering PR? Or both?

12:00 - Richard Seltzer
     Welcome, PeteVH and Jim Klaas. Please introduce yourselves, let us know your interests and dive in with questions.
     We're just getting started.

 12:00 - PeteVH
  I am co-owner of a company that sells professional development courses to teachers.

 12:01 - JimKlaas
     Hi, I am directing a Spanish Language distance learning Institute and am intested in better learning how to promote what
     we are doing. We have worked hard on good course content but now need more students.

 12:05 - Richard Seltzer
     Welcome, John Commando -- please introduce yourself and dive in. This is pretty much a free-for-all. Ask
     questions or pick up questions and answer them.

 12:09 - John Comando
     I'm partners with Ethel in NeedhamGroup a small public relations firm. I have more than 20 uear experience in marketing
     and public relations in a number of capacities.

 12:30 - Richard Seltzer
     Welcome, Dawn Drake, Bob Zwick, and Margie -- please introduce yourselves and dive into the discussion with
     questions or advice.

12:31 - BobZwick
     Bob Zwick - independent consultant / software developer - Distance Education and electronic publishing.

 12:36 - dawn drake
     Dawn Drake--Executive Director of Distance Education the University of Wisconsin-Platteville. We have a small budged so I want to be able      to make more use of PR tools. Unfortunately, we also are extremely short staffed, so the time commitement for doing      this seems a bit overwhelming. What are the top 2-3 things to do to get your message heard (that will be the least
     time-consuming to produce)?


PR for a non-profit

11:53 - John Watkins
     I run a non-profit trying to get some new social ideas into the public arena in such a way that we can attract financial
     support and recognition for the ideas.

12:00 - Ethel Kaiden
     John, I would think about several things including an on-line newsletter, meetings with appropriate analysts or press or
     perhaps a white paper that you could "market" to newspapers and regional publications.

 12:00 - John Watkins
      One of the strategies I'm thinking about implementing is to provide a special free membership category for writers. They
     can find lots of interesting story material on our website and in future issues of our weekly Ezine--as well as in transcripts
     of some task forces we've established. What's the best way to get the word out about availability of those memberships?

 12:03 - Ethel Kaiden
     John, you might want to look for where free listings are available in major newspapers. You also might want to invest in a
     direct mail piece if you have a good mailing list.

 12:07 - John Watkins     (Re: 12:03 - Ethel Kaiden 'John, you might want to look for where free listings...')
     What types of free listings are you thinking about? One of our problems is financial so direct mailings are almost out of
     the question. I'm also beginning to think that they're less necessary with the internet as a medium for communication. But,
     we have the Gebbie Press newspaper lists and email addresses of roughly 1,500 with which we communicate regularly.
     Unfortunately, the email addresses we have don't reach people with some of the specific content interests we have.
     That's particularly true with some of the larger newspapers. I also participate in a number of email discussion groups with
     other writers.


Importance of PR in tough times

12:01 - Richard Seltzer
     Ethel -- my sense is that many companies, both big and small, tend to treat PR as an extra, an add-on, something that,
     while good, isn't necessary; one of the first expenses to get cut when times get tough. Is that what you see?

 12:06 - Ethel Kaiden
     Richard,
     Cutting out PR when times are tough is probably the worst mistake that a company can make. It is the most efficient,
     believable and inexpensive way of promoting your business and getting sales. Using the web efficiently is probably the
     easiest way. Writing articles and working with both analysts and targeted press is essential. If people do not know your
     out there - the best products in the world will not sell.

 12:31 - Richard Seltzer
     Ethel and John -- speaking of "tough times" have you noticed any change over the last couple weeks? All of a sudden,
     I've started getting email from recruiters and from Interent startups, after a year and a half of just about silence. I think
     there's some serious stirring going on out there. Have you noticed any evidence of that?

 12:36 - Ethel Kaiden
     Richard,
     I notice some change over the last few weeks. The change probably mimics the slight upturn in the stock market. I think
     for things to improve significantly companies need to begin to hire again. By the way, there are a lot of consultants out
     there that are doing consulting temporarily to put food on the table. Also large PR agencies are lowering their prices in
     order to compete. Watch a big change as things get a little better. The large agencies will not longer be interested in the
     small client and prices will escalate. If you look to a small agency or practitioner they are going to give you personal
     service and stick with you when times get better.


Use of the Internet for PR


 12:05 - Richard Seltzer
     Ethel -- I suspect that even today many PR professionals are very wedded to the old face-to-face, snail-mail, and
     telephone means of presenting messages to the press, and probably underuse or misuse the Internet. I also suspect that
     in tough times some guerrilla-style Internet-based techniques might be comparatively low cost and viable with a low
     budget. Any thoughts along those lines?

 12:07 - Ethel Kaiden
     Richard,
     The internet is one of the best low-cost expansive tools that a PR professional can use today to get the word out. By the
     time you send a press release out the news is old.

12:07 - Richard Seltzer     (Re: 12:03 - Ethel Kaiden 'John, you might want to look for where free listings...')
      Mailing lists, I believe are one of the main differences between traditional PR and Internet-based PR. Yes, it is possible
     to buy or compile email mailing lists; but one need to proceed with caution both in acquiring/building the list and also in
     using it. If your message is perceived as spam then you could be far worse off after the mailing than before.

 12:08 - Richard Seltzer     (Re: 12:07 - Ethel Kaiden 'Richard,...')
     Ethel -- let's start with the notion of a press release. It feels like in good times or in bad, you are going to need to write
     press releases; but how you distribute and promote that news will probably differ according to your budget. What can you/should you do with it on the Internet? How can you build or get access to a
     good list of email addresses of just the right media people? And how can you/should you present yourself to maximize
     the chance that your message will be read, rather than discarded immediately as spam?

 12:10 - John Comando
     I'd like to ask the participants how they are letting people know about their products and services now. How are they
     using the web? What other methods do they use?

 12:11 - Ethel Kaiden
     As far as press releases go the wire services are a good way to get your press release to a large group of folks and to
     the bureaus like AP etc. You can limit the cost of a wire service by keeping your message brief and targeting the
     distribution.

 12:30 - Ethel Kaiden
     Research and homework pay off. By just shooting an arrow into the air you do not know where it will land. The Internet
     is a great source of information. There are many sites including an international site called www. publist.com that allows
     you to obtain editors names and publications all over the world that deal with the subject matter you are researching.

 12:35 - Richard Seltzer     (Re: 12:30 - Ethel Kaiden 'Research and homework pay off. By just shooting an...')
     Ethel -- Amen. Even if your arrow randomly hits its target, if you don't know what you are doing, you may not know that
     you hit it -- sure you shot the goose, but if you don't know you did, it's carcass will just rot. You need to know how to
     followup and find out where and how your message has been picked up. The News search capabiltiy at Google and
     AltaVista can be very helpful in that regard. Often it's what you do after your press release gets picked up that's
     important -- how you leverage a mention in one place to get a mention in another, maybe even to stir up some
     controversy. (Few people read books reviews; many people read the blurbs that publisher extract/quote from book
     reviews for book covers and promot material. First you have to find those mentions; then you have to reuse them
     effectively.)


Reaching analysts and targeted press

12:06 - JimKlaas
      Ethel, could you explain what you mean by "analysts and targeted press".

 12:10 - Ethel Kaiden
     Jim,
     Targeted press means looking at publications or newspapers that deal specifically with your business interest instead of
     just blasting news out to thousands that do not have an interest in your subject matter. For instance if you deal with the
     Internet look for specific Internet publications. Analysts are folks that look at your product or business and do an
     analysis. There are analysts in all fields of interest. You can then use their analysis to promote your product / service and
     you have an authenticated reference.

 12:13 - Richard Seltzer     (Re: 12:10 - Ethel Kaiden 'Jim,...')
     Targeted. Amen. Please correct me when I'm wrong, Ethel and John. I'm throwing out ideas to stimulate discussion. I am
     not a PR expert. Is there a good source from which you can buy an annotated list of media contacts -- a list that includes
     not just email addresses, but information about each writer and each publication, so you can judiciously choose which
     ones to send your message to? If not, perhaps the first job is to build such a list yourself. And once you have it, to send
     your press releases out one by one, rather than in bulk, with a personal cover note; or even tailoring the text of the
     release for the needs of individual reporters. I'm figuring that the tougher the times, the more targeted you want to be and
     the more you might be willing to put in the extra time that personalization takes. Am I in the right ballpark?

 12:12 - John Comando
     About analysts: they also have clients that may be you potential customers. They inform their clients about your product
     as a means of solving their problems.

 12:14 - John Watkins     (Re: 12:12 - John Comando 'About analysts: they also have clients that may be you...')
     But, how do you find analysts who are interested in your type of product/service? Do you pay them? Are they
     employees of the existing media? Consultants?

 12:18 - Ethel Kaiden
     John Watkins - you do not pay them unless you subscribe to their services. Your PR rep can arrange such meetings.
     You will have to pay your PR rep but you do not pay the Analyst. If you paid the Analyst they would not be as
     believable to your customers.

 12:15 - Richard Seltzer     (Re: 12:12 - John Comando 'About analysts: they also have clients that may be you...')
     John, do you use home-grown contact lists of "analysts"? Or is there a company or association that rents/sells such lists
     (with enough detailed annotation to make good use of it)?

12:16 - Ethel Kaiden
     The best list is one that you or your PR rep builds. You can aget long lists of media from services such as media map.
     Your best bet is to hire an experience PR agency (Needham Group can be found at www.needhamgroup.com - just a
     small plug) and let them do the work for you. PR firms or folks are the experts in their field and can save you a lot of
     money in the long run and help to get you a lot of business in the short term.

 12:19 - John Comando
     A good media list takes research. The web has made that a lot easier. If you don't know already, ask your customers
     what publications they read. Look at pub. web sites and find reporters that write on products like your or industries you
     serve.

 12:22 - Ethel Kaiden

     One of the first things that we do with a client is to develop a contact list specific to their product and interest. In some
     cases these are strictly trade publications. In other cases we look to develop the big story or business story - how the
     product or services helps a bigger cause. There are also interesting ways to get messages across including the use of
     video.

 12:52 - BobZwick
     Ethel - what is your opinion on services like ReleasIt that send press releases to hundreds of contacts ?

 12:54 - John Comando
     Two resources: Business Wire $(100/year membership) has a features distribution circuit http://www.businesswire.com
     Meida Map has an experts database that reports reference. http://www.mediamap.com


Getting the attention of the press

 12:11 - PeteVH
     Getting the press's attention is the tough part -- what are they looking for that will draw them to my press release vs.
     Richard's?

 12:13 - Ethel Kaiden
     Pete,
     You have to be very clear in your messages and make sure that your first paragraph says who you are and what makes
     what you have to offer unique. Clarity of messages is the most important thing in a press release. Use simple language
     that people understand immediately and make sure your messages are clear and tested.

 12:14 - John Comando
     How to get the press' attention: Target the right reporters and editors. Put the news in the subject line. In your cover
     email tell them why they and their readers should be interested. Draw them in with the headline. Give them the news in
     the first paragraph.

 12:15 - PeteVH     (Re: 12:13 - Ethel Kaiden 'Pete,...')
     Understand about the message, but aren't press folks looking for the "unusual" and something that will grab their
     audiences' attention? Are there ways of getting attention other than "selling the product/service?"

 12:17 - John Comando
     Press are not necessarily looking for the unusual. They are looking for news that will help their readers. They have to be
     able to identify the relationship between you news and the readers' needs.


Importance of message clarity


 12:17 - JimKlaas     (Re: 12:13 - Ethel Kaiden 'Pete,...')
      I know I am thinking at a very basic level, but since my target is Latin America, i am unsure what clarity of message
      implies in dressing it up with HTML to increase its appeal versus plain simple brief text.

 12:19 - John Watkins
     Jim, just a side note. I feel rather strongly that clarity is the key and that the message should not be dressed up except in
     those situations where the "dressing" truly improves your ability to present an important idea. And, too many folk are
     unable to take advantage of the fancy stuff and some are irritated when you force them to use it.


Following up with the press


 12:18 - Richard Seltzer
     Ethel and John -- I believe that one of the most important aspects of the Internet for PR style communication, especially
     in down times, is the ability for quick followup. You don't just send out targeted press releases; you come back in a day
     or two with an extra tidbit of information or a quick helpful reminder and offer of related help. Have you tried that
     approach? Have you found it effective? (To me, a followup email message is far less invasive and annoying than a phone
     call. A phone call interrupts the flow of my thoughts and my work; but I look at email when I want and can choose to
     discard it unread. Email also provides me with raw text -- the actual facts -- in a form that I can readily copy and paste
     into a story; while with a phone call I'm dependent on my memory or my garbled notes...

 12:20 - Ethel Kaiden

     ABSOLUTELY - follow up is key to everything. You must constantly follow up. The whole purpose of a press release
     is to introduce - what you really want is the story that follows

 12:21 - John Comando

     Most editors do NOT want to be contacted about whether they received your release. A good cover email that shows
     you know their pub. helps. For example, if they have an online newsletter, suggest that they post it there.


"Shadowing" as a way to build a relationship with a reporter


 12:19 - Richard Seltzer     (Re: 12:16 - Ethel Kaiden 'The best list is one that you or your PR...')
     Ethel -- are there particular reporters who you watch regularly for particular clients? "Shadowing" seems (at least to me)
     to be an effective technique.

 12:21 - PeteVH
     Beyond the world of press releases, emails, and newsletters, what other techniques can we small 1, 2, 3, person
     businesses do to improve PR?

 12:21 - Richard Seltzer     (Re: 12:19 - Richard Seltzer 'Ethel -- are there particular reporters who you watch regularly...')
     I guess I better explain "shadowing". First you go to Google or AltaVista and click on the "News" tab and search for
     topics that are of particular importance to you (or your client). Look for well-written original news stories and that
     indicate intellectual curiosity in subjects that matter to you (not just someone rewriting press releases and paraphrasing
     AP stories).

 12:24 - Richard Seltzer     (Re: 12:21 - PeteVH 'Beyond the world of press releases, emails, and newsletters, what...')
    Pete --  This "shadow" thing I'm trying to describe might be helpful to you, Pete. After you have identified 1-3 top reporters, go
     to the Web sites of their publications regularly and read everything that they write. When a story of theirs sparks an idea
     of your own, or when you have an additional piece of information that would have be useful to them in writing that story,
     send that person email pronto (preferably the very day their article appeared, telling them everything that might be helpful
     and offering to help them when they are working on stories of that kind. Make sure they know how to get back to you
     (phone and email).

 12:24 - Ethel Kaiden
     Pete,
     A lot of it is in building relationships with the influencers of the world. THis can be done by doing user stories which are
     sometimes called success stories - using your current customers to tell the story. You can also arrange to do byline
     articles and speaking engagements at conferences, trade show etc. are very important.

 12:24 - John Comando
     Public relations is about relationships. When you know the reporter, they are more likely to take notice of your release.
     By follow-up, we should keep in regular contact with reporters that cover our product areas.  All publications have editorial calendars. They are on web sites. Inquiring about potential editorial opportunities is a good way to start relationships. Most editors will be helpful.

 12:27 - Richard Seltzer     (Re: 12:24 - Richard Seltzer 'This 'shadow' thing I'm trying to describe might be helpful...')
     Example of "shadowing". I stumbled into this. I didn't do it deliberately. Someone pointed me to a New York Times
     article about electronic books. It was well done. I sent my reactions and further thoughts to the reporter. He was (as
     many reporters are) delighted to have a fan and delighted to discuss the issues raised by the piece. Our discussion
     ranged widely. He checked out some of the stuff at my Web site. And a week later, when writing a story on another
     Internet-related subject, he called me for leads and advice. A month later, he called about another story, and this time he
     quoted me in his piece (complete with my URL). That kind of personal contact can be very valuable over the long haul.
     You don't get there with mass mailings. And only with the Internet is such a contact possible.

 12:29 - Richard Seltzer     (Re: 12:24 - John Comando 'Public relations is about relationships. When you know the...')
     Amen. That's the basis of what I call "shadowing". In general, the better you know a publication, the better you know a
     particular reporter, the better you will be able to present your information in a way that is helpful to them. And the most
     help you provide, the more likely they are to remember you and listen to your suggestions in the future. The ultimate
     relationship with a reporter is a mutually beneficial dialogue.


Open letters and op-ed pieces

 12:23 - John Watkins
     Occasionally, we send a "news" release but more often than not we send a letter to the editor. Yesterday, for the first
     time, I tried sending an op-ed piece. But, releases, letters, and op-de pieces are going to exactly the same email
     addresses. So, my first question is whether it makes sense to send this type of material and ... guess I'll leave the question
     open-ended beyond that.

 12:24 - JimKlaas     (Re: 12:23 - John Watkins 'Occasionally, we send a 'news' release but more often than...')
      Please define an op-ed piece

12:27 - John Watkins     (Re: 12:24 - JimKlaas 'Please define an op-ed piece...')
     Jim, an op-ed piece is similar to an editorial ar an informative article except it is written by someone other than the
     editorial staff of the newspaper and it usually appears on the page opposite to the editorial page -- thus op-ed.

 12:27 - John Comando
     An op-ed piece is usually an opinion piece written by you. The term comes from the page opposite the editorial page in
     the newspaper. The articles in the WSJ next to the editorials are op-eds.

 12:27 - Ethel Kaiden
     John, open letters often find their way directly to the waste basket. To get to the right person it is important to research
     who handles your type of product or service news at the publication and over time build a relationship - One way might
     be to demo the product to the influencer. Most people go to a dentist when they have a toothache - it is crucial to go to
     a communications person when you need to communicate.

 12:28 - John Comando
     Many magazines have opinion columns. Best to contact the editor directly to inquire about subitting an idea. Once again,
     you should have a well developed idea ready to suggest.

 12:29 - JimKlaas     (Re: 12:27 - John Watkins 'Jim, an op-ed piece is similar to an editorial ar...')
      Do you send the periodical the article as an op-ed piece or simply hoping they will put it there.

 12:29 - John Watkins     (Re: 12:27 - Ethel Kaiden 'John, open letters often find their way directly to...')
     In our case, we're not selling a product per se. Instead we're offering ideas about solutions to important social problems
     such as health care, social security, domestic violence.

 12:32 - John Comando
     Writing an article takes a lot of time, and if you have someone do it for you, a lot of money. Best is to call the editor or
     email with a follow-up call to discuss your idea first. Don't write on spec, unless you plan to use it as sales collateral or a
     web site piece.

 12:32 - Ethel Kaiden
     John,
     Same thing - your ideas are your product and you can treat them the same way you would a physical product. The
     biggest distinction is doing the research on what publications, conferences that market to the folks you are trying to
     reach.

 12:33 - John Watkins     (Re: 12:29 - JimKlaas 'Do you send the periodical the article as an op-ed...')
     Jim, our subject line is always preceded by some descrip0tor such as news, letter, op-ed. Then there is occasionally
     afurther explanation in the body of the message. In the op-ed piece, the first paragraph read "You have permission to
     publish the following op-ed article without      charge as long as you include the brief credit information that
     appears at the end."

 12:35 - John Comando
     John W.- If you've got advice to sell, there's a market. Once again, target the most likely outlets, research what they're
     interested in, and craft your message to meet their readers' needs,

 12:35 - BobZwick     (Re: 12:33 - John Watkins 'Jim, our subject line is always preceded by some descrip0tor...')
      Is it wise or customary to tell an Editor that they can publish your piece without editing it ?

 12:36 - Richard Seltzer     (Re: 12:33 - John Watkins 'Jim, our subject line is always preceded by some descrip0tor...')
     John Watkins -- my personal reaction to such things is to delete just about anything that doesn't sound like (from the
     subject line on) it was addressed to me in particular. Ethel -- am I an exception to the rule?

 12:38 - John Watkins     (Re: 12:35 - BobZwick 'Is it wise or customary to tell an Editor that...')
     Bob, that's a good question (Is it wise or customary to tell an Editor that they can publish your piece without editing it?)
     and I'd welcome some other thoughts on it. Frankly, I'm willing to take the chance but what would be a better
     approach?

 12:39 - Ethel Kaiden
     Bob,
     Some editors will publish your piece as is - most will edit it. WHat you want to do is try and ensure that the editor lets
     you see the piece before it is printed so that if anything is misinterpreted in can be caught. I once had the opportunity that
     resulted in a cover story in Fortune. Even at Fortune magazine we were allowed to review the article with the editor
     before it was published. In doing so - we uncovered some negatively worded ideas that we were able to turn around.

 12:39 - Richard Seltzer     (Re: 12:35 - BobZwick 'Is it wise or customary to tell an Editor that...')
     Ethel and John, please correct me if I'm wrong here -- Editors presume that they can do anything that they want with
     material that is sent to them in the format of a press release. There's no point in telling them what you think they can or
     should do with it. They'll do what they please. The worst (laziest) will just take unedited chunks of what you say and
     plop it down in a new context that distorts its meaning. The best will completely rewrite, trying to make sense of what
     you say in the context of what competitors are saying (and may well totally distort your meaning). Every distortion, every
     mistake is an opportunity for further communication with the writer, if you take a constructive approach.

 12:40 - John Comando     (Re: 12:33 - John Watkins 'Jim, our subject line is always preceded by some descrip0tor...')
      John, does anyone ever use your op-eds?

 12:40 - BobZwick     (Re: 12:38 - John Watkins 'Bob, that's a good question (Is it wise or customary...')
     John - I would think that asking for input on any major changes to the article would be more approppriate. I think they
     would probably contact you if they were going ot do a major re-write.

 12:40 - JimKlaas
     Time of sending is very important to anything I receive. The wee morning hours is when the most spam is sent
     out.

 12:41 - Richard Seltzer     (Re: 12:39 - Ethel Kaiden 'Bob,...')
     Yes, indeed, it is great if a reporter will let you see and commment on a piece before publication. I suspect though that
     that is very difficult, and only comes through building relationships over a long period of time -- that's one of the main
     values of working with an agency with experienced professionals. Often they know the reporters from long before they
     came to know you.

 12:42 - John Watkins     (Re: 12:36 - Richard Seltzer 'John Watkins -- my personal reaction to such things is...')
     Richard--yes. I agree and delete a lot of general stuff. Part of the trick though is to make sure the subject line says there
     is something of interest and then to be sure the content meets the expectation. Once it meets that text, I don't care if there
     is a line that says "John, this is for you."

  12:43 - Richard Seltzer     (Re: 12:36 - Ethel Kaiden 'Richard,...')
     Ethel -- good point. This may be a very good time for a small company to build a relationship with a PR agency. The
     agencies are hungry right now; and will be able to give you the time and attention that you need; then as business picks
     up, you are an established client.

 12:43 - Ethel Kaiden
     You are right about press releases Richard. If something is printed that distorts the release or article you can call the
     editor and try and set the record straight. What you do not want to do is appear combative - simple offer a correction.
     Most good editors or writers are willing to work with you, One method that has worked for me is to invite the editor to
     your place of business and demo your product or discuss your ideas.

 12:45 - John Watkins
     Truly, I don't yet know. The first attempt went out yesterday. I do intend to promote them more directly in the future but
     until that's possible, this is one avenue for putting them "out there." These are pieces that I have to write for our
     newsletter anyway so there is little or no extra work.

 12:46 - Richard Seltzer     (Re: 12:42 - John Watkins 'Richard--yes. I agree and delete a lot of general stuff....')
     I guess maybe it's good to keep several lists. The top list would be probably less than half a dozen reporters who now
     know you and the purpose of your organization and have some sympathy for what you are trying to do; and who, in turn,
     you know pretty well, having read quite a few of their stories, so you have a sense for the slant/bias they bring to their
     work. For each of them, write a separate targeted subject line and lead paragraph.

 12:46 - Ethel Kaiden
     Richard - that is not quite what I meant. What I am saying is beware of the large agency - or small one for that matter -
     that cuts prices way down during tough times - they will surely raise them when times get better or probaly, drop you as
     a client. A good agency large or small will service you fairly and efficiently always. Although they might give you a little
     more service during tough times because they have less clients!

 12:48 - Richard Seltzer     (Re: 12:43 - Ethel Kaiden 'You are right about press releases Richard. If something...')
     That reminds me of when I started my little publishing business -- I named it The B&R Samizdat Express. Samizdat
     means self-published in Russian. B is for Barbara, my wife. R is for Richard. And it sounded so much like a train, I called
     it Express instead of Press. Questions about the meaning of that name led to dozens of important reviews of our book.
     Anything to start a discussion with the reporter. A misunderstanding/distortion in an article is just an opportunity. You just
     need to be very thick-skinned. Expect distortion. Be delighted by accuracy. And always be friendly and helpful.

 12:50 - John Watkins     (Re: 12:48 - Richard Seltzer 'That reminds me of when I started my little publishing...')
     Richard, there has been much excellent content today but I hope this part of your advice will not be missed. "Expect
     distortion. Be delighted by accuracy. And always be friendly and helpful."

 12:48 - PeteVH
     Ethel, as a very small business, budgets are always tight -- no matter how good times are :-) -- just ask one of us. Can
     you give us an idea of price for your services? I'm sure "it depends upon what we want." But an example would be
     helpful to see how it fits into a budget.

 12:54 - Ethel Kaiden
     john _ very good point> Pete> we work with our clients to meet their financial restraints and come up with a workable
     budget> we also do project work such as launches or press contact or speaking engagements or training etc etc _ if you
     are interested contact us and we can talk further JOHN AND I KNOW WHAT IT IS TO HAVE A SMALL
     BUSINESS AND A SMALL BUDGET>  Buyer beware of marketing to the masses. You are much better off narrowing    your field.

 12:56 - Richard Seltzer     (Re: 12:55 - Ethel Kaiden 'BUYER BEWARE OF MARKETING TO THE MASSES> YOU ARE...')
     Amen. The more targeted and personal and truly helpful you are, the better the results you are likely to get.

 12:49 - Ethel Kaiden
     Any reason to contact an editor is a good reason. Do not be afraid of developing stories and then trying to get them
     published - this is especially true when your product is an idea.


Wrapup


 12:52 - Richard Seltzer
     All -- we're getting near the end of the hour. If you have final words of wisdom or questions, fire away -- fast.

 12:54 - Richard Seltzer
     All, we have to wrap up now. Please, before you disconnect, post here your email addresses and URLs, so we can stay
     in touch. I hope to post an edited version of the transcript by Monday. Check http://www.samizdat.com/chat.html
     Meanwhile, you can come back here at any time to check the raw transcript (which is automatically saved). Thanks very
     much for joining us today. Thanks especially to Ethel and John Commando.

 12:55 - Richard Seltzer
     We'll be back again next week -- same time, same routine -- talking with David Weinberger, author of an insightful new
     book about Internet business and behavior on the Internet. Check http://www.samizdat.com/chat.html for details.

 12:55 - BobZwick
     cottagemicro@hotmail.com
     http://www.cottagemicro.com
     Thanks Ethel & John

 12:55 - John Comando
       johnc@needhamgroup.com

12:55 - JimKlaas
     Thanks very much Ethel, John and Richard. I found this helpful though I am thinking from square 1.

12:55 - John Watkins
     John Watkins, Simple Society and the Allinace for Human Empowerment, johnw@simsoc.org http://simsoc.org

 12:56 - PeteVH
     Pete Vander Haeghen pvh@earthlink.net http://www.virtualed.net

 12:56 - JimKlaas
     ID@xc.org

 12:56 - dawn drake
     Thanks much for the info. This was a nice session.
     Dawn Drake Drake@uwplatt.edu
     http://www.uwplatt.edu/~disted

 12:57 - Ethel Kaiden
     ethelk@needhamgroup.com  thanks everyone

 12:56 - Richard Seltzer
     Thanks again to all. Signing off.



Previous transcripts and schedule of upcoming chats -- www.samizdat.com/chat.html

To connect to the chat room, go to www.samizdat.com/chat-intro.html

Edited transcript of recent auction-related chat sessions

eBay update -- what's changed over the last few years and how you can take advantage as a seller: details that pay (2002)
Guide to eBay for sellers -- practical advice from one seller to another (1999)
More practical advice for sellers at auctions -- the devil in the details (1999)
Other auction articles by Richard Seltzer

The full text of Richard Seltzer's books The Social Web, Take Charge of Your Web Site, Shop Online the Lazy Way, and The Way of the Web, plus more than a hundred related articles are available on CD ROM My Internet: a
Personal View of Internet Business Opportunities.

Web Business Boot Camp: Hands-on Internet lessons for manager, entrepreneurs, and professionals by Richard Seltzer (Wiley, 2002). No-nonsense guide targets activities that anyone can perform to achieve online business success. Reviews.

a library for the price of a book.

This site is Published by B&R Samizdat Express, 33 Gould St., West Roxbury, MA 02132. (617) 469-2269. seltzer@samizdat.com
 
 


Return to B&R Samizdat Express


Pet Care | Surgeon: Los Angeles Plastic Surgery| Facial Surgery: Los Angeles Facelift | Hair Loss? Try Hair Restoration | Online Auction | Pet Owners: Veterinary Directory | Health Directory of Nutrition Business | Pet, Home, Garden | Wholesale Distributors | Class Action Lawsuits | Mortgages | Mortgage Refinancing | Home Loans - Mortgage Loans | Mortgage Refinancing Loans |

Google
  Websamizdat.com